Jahandar Akbari; Mohammad Ashouri; Mohammad Ali Ardabili; ali saffaari
Abstract
Death penalty is disputed retribution between the chain of retributions with different execution styles has accompanied humans throughout history with numerous followers and opponents. In the last decades disputes between the followers and opponents between the followers and opponents of this retribution ...
Read More
Death penalty is disputed retribution between the chain of retributions with different execution styles has accompanied humans throughout history with numerous followers and opponents. In the last decades disputes between the followers and opponents between the followers and opponents of this retribution has continued more extensively. The result of these fundamental disputes of the opponents and elimination of this retribution from the criminal law or in some cases, despite keeping it in texts. The execution is eliminated. This article focuses on the death penalty while looking for attaining the philosophy of death penalty by utilizing the two major views of retributivism and utilitarianism in philosophy of retribution and it’s reconciliation with each of the two views mentioned before. The results indicate the although death penalty is mostly accordant to the objectives of utilitarianism like incapacitation and relative compatibility with preventing through intimidation, it is corresponding more with the opponent view that is retributivism. Revocation or undermining the routine futuristic justifications of life deprivation punishment, can help legislator remove or at least limit the punishment.
ali safari; razieh saberi
Abstract
In this paper, the analysis of one of the main prerequisite conditions of
situational prevention, i.e. the warning condition is investigated. The condition
is analyzed under two main titles; the first one is the necessity of warning in
Fiqh, human rights, and criminology. Afterward, such necessity ...
Read More
In this paper, the analysis of one of the main prerequisite conditions of
situational prevention, i.e. the warning condition is investigated. The condition
is analyzed under two main titles; the first one is the necessity of warning in
Fiqh, human rights, and criminology. Afterward, such necessity alongside its
conditions in order to achieve the proper way of warning is examined from the
viewpoint of ordinary people, experts, and offenders. It will be concluded that,
for it is fairly common for ordinary citizens who use dangerous or even fatal
protective equipment to keep their properties safe from any criminal activities, it
is essential for the state to make attempts to suggest appropriate laws to the
legislature and legally determines conditions, types and other technicalities of
different situational crime prevention measures and their legal limits. In this
way, people will be aware of the legal domain of taking preventive measures
without being trapped in criminal liability for hurting people who face such
measures during their criminal activities.
